Image from THEPHILBIZNEWS
The efforts being exerted by the Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines (IPOPHL) in its sustained campaign about the importance of protecting intellectual property are continually paying off.
Based on the first half of 2021, IPOPHL posted a 20% year-on-year growth as the economy recovered further from eased lockdown restrictions while the Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines (IPOPHL) succeeded in highlighting the importance of IP in business recovery.
In total, IP applications stood at 22,919. Utility model (UM) filings saw the biggest increase at 26%, from the 592 recorded from January to June last year to 744.
Driving this increase were residents whose filings climbed 29% from 555 to 715. On the other hand, non-resident UM filings contracted by 22% from 37 to 29.
The top fields for UM filings during the period were in food chemistry (239 filings); basic materials chemistry (39); special machines (32); handling (20); and IT methods for management (19).
Trademark filings increased as well by 23% from 15,969 filings to 19,649. Resident filings made up the bulk of the applications and registered a 39% surge from 8,859 to 12,288.
International filings, which are made through the Madrid Protocol, dropped 5% from 3,859 to 3,677.
Most trademark filings were in pharmaceuticals, health, cosmetics (5,786); agricultural products and services (5,473); scientific research, information and communication technology (4,204); management communications, real estate and financial services (3,614); and textiles, clothing and accessories (2,865).
Patent filings rose by 2% from 1,899 to 1,945. The majority of the growth came from non-residents with 165 filings, an increase of 23%. Filings through the international Patent Cooperation Treaty edged down by a mere 1% from 1,599 to 1,586.
The top fields for patent filings were from pharmaceuticals (1,020); organic fine chemistry (523); biotechnology (312); basic materials chemistry (198); and food chemistry (176).
Meanwhile, copyright deposits soared by 163% from 285 to 761.
The lone laggard during the period was industrial design with filings sliding 10% to 581. While resident filings increased by 8% to 339, non-resident applications for ID decreased by 27% to 242.
Fields with the most ID filings were furnishing (26); means of transport or hoisting (26); packages and containers for the transport or handling of goods (22); articles of adornment (18); and fluid distribution equipment, sanitary, heating, ventilation and air-conditioning equipment, solid fuel (16).
IP for economic recovery
IPOPHL Director General Rowel S. Barba shared the good news of recovering filings at a recent event of the IP Office of Singapore in celebration of the country’s IP Week.
“This development is a strong indication that some businesses in the Philippines are recovering and seeing the importance of IP as a competitive tool,” Barba said at a plenary where he joined global IP leaders to discuss how their respective countries are leveraging IP for economic recovery.
Apart from that, Director General Barba also attributed the availability of IPOPHL’s end-to-end service for online registration and the dedicated work the staff has put in encouraging IP protection.
Barba said IPOPHL will continue improving its online services to ensure smooth registrations. It will also continue amplifying its educational and capacity-building initiatives to reach more MSMEs and independent creators and innovators, ensuring an inclusive recovery.
While he recognizes the possible impacts of the reimposition of stringent quarantine protocols on IP activities, Barba maintains a positive long-term outlook on IP’s contribution to economy and society.
“We’ve been seeing how disruptive companies and those who have built their brands on IP are bucking the crisis’ adverse effects on businesses. As we gear up for faster economic recovery, the country will inevitably realize more how IP is a catalyst for resilient growth. And IPOPHL will take this juncture as an opportunity to help the economy build stronger and the society think differently with IP,” the IPOPHL chief added.
