Building on its groundbreaking launch in 2023, this year’s Giga Summit will explore latest industry developments in light of the growing influence of artificial intelligence and nuclear power and its potential to drive a more resilient and future-ready power sector.

Scheduled for April 24 to 25 at The Fifth at Rockwell in Makati City, the event will serve as a platform to drive key conversations on sustainable solutions that will propel the industry toward long-term growth.

The Sustainable Power Supply discussions on the first day will feature dialogues on renewable energy sources, including nuclear power and its potential role in securing the country’s future power needs. Keynote sessions on “Trailblazers: The Global Giants of Sustainable Power” will be led by MGEN Renewable Energy Inc. (MGreen), Electricité de France, Mitsubishi Power, and Actis; while “The Case for Nuclear-Powered Future” session will be facilitated by the International Atomic Energy Agency. Experts from Canada, France, South Korea, Japan, and US will join the energy dialogue on “Nuclear Power, the Operator’s Perspective”.

The second day will focus on Power Grid Disruptors, featuring discussions on distributed energy resources, virtual power plants, and battery energy storage systems. Industry leaders from Meralco, Huawei, Microsoft, and global energy organizations will explore crisis leadership, AI-driven grid transformation, and the future of the Philippine power industry. The event will conclude with insights into pioneering AI-powered grids and strategies for building a future-proof distribution network.

“The Giga Summit 2025 is where vision meets action that will drive transformation in the ever-evolving landscape. As we unite local and global leaders on one stage, we are not just having conversations; we’re exploring the transformative power of AI in redefining the country’s energy future,” MPA President and Meralco Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer Ronnie L. Aperocho said.

Also joining the summit are leaders from the Department of Energy, Philippine Senate, and Energy Regulatory Commission.

Interested participants may register at https://www.meralcopoweracademy.org/giga-summit-registration-form/

Apart from that, Japan reminded China that its nuclear power plants released significantly higher amount of tritium into the ocean compared with the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Advanced Liquid Processing System (ALPS treated) water. Japan reiterated that its decision to release the water into the sea has the backing of the international community and experts from the nuclear energy organizations who independently studied and validated that the government has safety as its primordial concern as well as the well-being of the people and they are continually monitoring the activities and processes.

Japan also underscored that when there was an investigation about the origins of COVID-19, the WHO-China joint study said that “the study of origins is a scientific matter“ and “should not be politicized.”

Meanwhile, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) published the Comprehensive Report revealed that the discharge of the ALPS treated water into the sea and associated activities are consistent with relevant international safety standards, and the discharge will have a negligible radiological impact on people and the environment.

On July 4, 2023, The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) published the Comprehensive Report. The report states that Japan’s plans to discharge the ALPS treated water into the sea and associated activities are consistent with relevant international safety standards, and the discharge will have a negligible radiological impact on people and the environment.

Japan has provided information to the international community in a transparent manner based on scientific evidence, with an emphasis on providing sufficient data. Nevertheless, there are some who questioned the IAEA Comprehensive Report. I believe this is evidence of their disregard for science and such moves will only hamper global cooperation in utilizing nuclear energy and jeopardize international cooperation to ensure its safety. A spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of China once said that “the study of origins is a scientific matter that should be conducted jointly by scientists all over the globe and should not be politicized” in response to criticism of the WHO-China joint study of the origins of SARS-CoV-2. Japan has exactly done this about ALPS treated water—leave the issue to the scientists to solve.

The IAEA also notes that the discharge into the sea is “technically feasible.” In more detail, we will manage the annual discharge volume of tritium so it will not exceed 22 trillion Bq, which is equivalent to the target discharge management value for the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station before the accident. It is worth noting that other countries also discharge tritium into the sea in compliance with their own domestic laws and regulations; for instance, according to China Nuclear Energy Association website, China, discharging 112 trillion Bq from Yangjiang Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) in 2021. The amount of tritium in the ALPS treated water is far smaller than the amount of tritium discharged from many nuclear power plants and other facilities in other countries.

In addition, Japan will take all possible measures to ensure the safety of the discharge into the sea even after it begins, and will not discharge anything that could adversely affect the health or environment.

After the start of discharge into the sea, Japan will continue to conduct three types of monitoring (monitoring of treated water in tanks, real-time monitoring, and sea area monitoring) in a multilayered manner with the involvement of the IAEA, and if some event occurs, such as radioactivity levels exceeding standards, appropriate measures, including not discharging or suspending the discharge, will be taken. The information and experience gained in this long and difficult process of decommissioning nuclear power plant will be shared to help solve similar problems that the world may face in the future. Having gone through unprecedented hardships since the Great East Japan Earthquake, the Government of Japan has been and will continue to provide the necessary information in a transparent manner in close collaboration with the IAEA and will continue efforts to gain further understanding from the international community, while scientifically refuting politically motivated opinions.