Many are unfamiliar with veterans.
People like me who served in the military.
So, this is a description of sorts about who they are by one of them.
It is not meant to be a window dressing.
It is meant to be candid and honest.

Veterans were once young men and women who were forced to grow up fast at an early age.
They left the world they knew and entered another, leaving behind their “civilian antics”.
Still teenagers, they already endured loneliness, physical hardship, emotional stress, and psychological trauma.

“To kill or be killed” was no longer just a punchline.
It became a potent reality to stay alive and win the nation’s wars.
Thus, rigid discipline and unceasing training were the soldiers’ daily regimen.
Some made it; some didn’t.

They routinely got assigned and reassigned to different places.
Some were in combat roles; others in combat support and combat service support.
But all contributed and fought against the enemy one way or the other.
Some were heroic; others weren’t.

They came out of battles changed individuals.
Some who fought got wounded; others survived physically unscathed; and some came back with post-traumatic stress disorder.
And there were also those who paid the ultimate sacrifice.
And their families back home suffered as well.

Some battles were won; others were lost.
Sometimes, they who fought received medals and promotions; sometimes, they did not.
Sometimes, the intel, plan, leadership, and logistics were great; other times, they were poor.
And soldiers and non-combatant civilians alike paid dearly with their lives.

Oftentimes, the orders they had to follow were legal and moral which was great; but, sometimes they were not which sucked.
There were superb leaders whose competence, compassion, and leadership by example made war-fighting worth enduring.
But there were also corrupt, incompetent ones whose disservice and disloyalty the subordinate soldiers and the nation did not deserve.

They endured low pay and so their families shared their sacrifices for the nation as well.
A famous song sung by soldiers was: “You’ll never get rich you SOB, you’re in the army now.”
Being wounded in action or ill were even welcomed by family members because such gave them time to be with the loved one they longed for.
Frequent goodbyes and long separations were common and endured.

But it wasn’t all toil and hardship too.
Soldiering was fun — the shared experiences, camaraderie and esprit-de-corps developed through the years among bothers-in-arms, foreign and domestic, were priceless.
Their unique experiences are something that can never be had in civilian life.

Some retired from military life for good; but somehow, their years in uniform remained closest in their hearts and minds the rest of their days.
Some continued to work in government as civilians; others joined the private sector.
Some were honorable; some were corrupt.
Some changed their ways; others never did.

While someone said: “Old soldiers never die, they just fade away”; in truth, even soldiers do die and lest we forget — why memorials abound worldwide in honor of them and their ultimate sacrifices by so many grateful nations.
“Taps” calls on us all, and us veterans only know it too well.

Saint Francis of Assisi said that preachers preach and sometimes they use words.
He could just as well have been referring to military leaders, whose effective leadership modality is “action speaks louder than words”.
Veterans are individuals whose legacy in life were their selfless actions.
Remember their sacrifices when you see a frail, stooping veteran slowly marching down the street with his cane.

When Malacañang triumphantly declared that former congressman and alleged flood-control scammer Zaldy Co “caught” in Czechia, who informed the President about the arrest?

And why did another Cabinet official make bold announcements of “vigorous” negotiations, “quick” extradition, and “70-80% chance” of return?

This early expectations-raising narrative seemed reckless. Career diplomats know that the basics in this case were never in Manila’s favor: We have no extradition treaty with Czechia and the path via repatriation was narrow.

And as a THEPHILBIZNEWS source noted: A very real risk also exists that a competent lawyer could stall everything with an asylum claim in the EU.

So once Co slipped out of Czechia and reportedly surfaced in France seeking asylum, the Philippine government’s tone snapped back to reality.

This time, the first person to inform the President enters the picture again. This time, correcting earlier impressions (and appearing like from a bumbling government), official statements no longer had sweeping assurances: passport cancelled, Interpol notified, and embassy verifying.

The uncomfortable reminder that should have been front and center from Co’s reported arrest: Diplomacy, including EU asylum rules and NOT Philippine politics, set the pace.

Truly, the foreign service corps does not “get” fugitives. It tracks, coordinates, and negotiates — within laws it does not control.

For the first Presidential bearer of diplomacy news, the lesson should cut deep: You cannot declare a success (Co’s arrest in this case) before diplomacy has even begun.

Colonel Clarence E. Endy Jr. (Ret) of West Point’s Class of 1960 passed away on 15 March 2026 in Torrance, California. When I was a cadet at the United States Military in 1979-1983, he and his wife Elionora Royola Endy were my “foster” parents for the first three years that I was at the academy. I missed them as such as a senior because Colonel Endy retired in 1982 to work in the private sector. Their “fostering” me as well as other cadets, mostly of Asian descent, made my cadet life feel a semblance of home. I was an allied cadet from the Philippines, so I was very far away from home. In fact, their charity was already apparent from day one when I first arrived at JFK Airport in New York on 1 July 1979. If they had not sent an MP to meet me at the airport that night, I would have been late for my second R-Day the next day. You see, I already went through “Beast Barracks” at the Philippine Military Academy as a member of “Matikas” Class of 1983. R-Day or “Reception” Day began that experience. Colonel Endy was the Assistant Head of the Department of Electrical Engineering at the academy. It was at his quarters that I first met my future boss, General Fidel V. Ramos, attending his 30^th class reunion. Ramos was a member of USMA Class of 1950. I and the other cadets they fostered frequented the Endy quarters by the Hudson to partake of a hearty meal prepared by Mrs. Endy or just to hang out away from the rigors of cadet life. The Endys were old-school and so valued excellence in every aspect of life, especially academics. They valued integrity above all. While somewhat strict, Colonel Endy had a good heart, and I had glimpses of it as the years went by beyond his retirement from the army.

In his memorial page at the USMA Association of Graduates, I wrote the following testimonial: There are leaders of character among us, and we may not always know them. Right now, I especially think of one. It was him who did not let worldliness blind him. Who shined in whatever he did but never boasted about it. Who touched the lives of many but never burdened anyone. Who, after he retired from corporate life, struggled silently from advanced Alzheimer’s Disease for years until his recent passing. We once rode the train together chatting over beer from San Francisco to Atherton. Very principled, he had lots of wisdom and liked to tell war stories. He had served in Vietnam but also held a doctorate degree in Electrical Engineering from Purdue. He was a Starman at the academy (top 5% of his class) and served in the Signal Corps and Military Intelligence service branches. His paper at the Army War College in Leavenworth was on the USMA Allied Cadet Program with the Philippines. He and Mrs. Elionora “Li” Endy moved to California after he retired from the Army in 1982. He became CEO of several tech companies generously giving back to his alma mater by the Hudson whenever he could. He had been a shoo-in for star rank. But when I asked him why he decided not to get his well-deserved stars before leaving, he simply replied that it was time he gave back to Mrs. Endy the support and sacrifices she did for him while he wore the uniform serving his country. He said that rank was only a title. I wouldn’t say they didn’t have any children because “we” the younger grads they took care of, were their children. We spoke in Kuala Lumpur in 1995 while I was on a mission and he was on one of his countless CEO trips to Asia. I miss our conversations. He was gentle and kind, but feisty when it came to defending his family and friends and when witnessing wrong. They stayed in touch with us while I served my country even regularly sending box-full of goodies all the way to Manila! Mrs. Endy was a godmother to me and my late first wife Joji whom I met at West Point in 1981. She came to our 1985 wedding in Manila. Joji passed on from cancer in 2018. I remarried to Joy in 2023 in Boston. 

Colonel Sam Endy believed in people. He once wrote to me in 2009 something that touched me and never forgot: “(Your Founder’s Day keynote address) brought a lot of memories. One is that the wise investment in apostles such as you will keep the world on a better path, even though it may stray from time to time. Values count…and always will. Well intended people embracing those values and inspiring others will win out in the end. It is the light that the Dennis Acop’s of the world keep shining on the rest of us that gives meaning to our work here on earth.” — His inspiring words touched me, and I shall always cherish them the rest of my days. I have never forgotten him because of those words. His eloquence and manner of speaking also captured exactly who he was as an individual – his profound depth and breadth of wisdom. He was widely read and had tons of experience both in the public and private sectors. I will always remember him as like a father. Indeed, he and leaders like him remind us that the path of leadership is a lonely path. And that less travelled road of principled leadership is the loneliest but most rewarding path in the end. Very few, like Colonel Endy, ever take it. Well done sir. Be thou at peace.   

Cynicism, indifference, or hope! These seem to be the predominant attitudes of people given what’s happening in and to the world today. Wikipedia defines cynicism as “an attitude of scornful, jaded negativity and deep distrust of others’ motives, often assuming selfishness drives human behavior”. Given what we’ve experienced, seen in the news, watched on TV, or read on social media, such an attitude wouldn’t be surprising. Even our leaders in the organizations we work for, or our elders advise us not to be too trusting, since people are simply acting out the way they do to make money. Well, at least some of them, or most of them, depending on your experience. I’ve worked both in the public and private sectors, and I’ve had bosses who were cynical. I had a commanding officer in the military who often cursed and seemed not to have any respect for any of his superiors painting them as corrupt womanizers.

In fairness to those corrupt womanizers, my CO was one too. So, I often wondered what the hell he was talking about. After I had left the military, a corporate boss of mine also liked to speak candidly, and after working with him for some years, I realized that he frequently interjected his comments with informal but revealing details about how people were just about the money. The daily news, TV shows, and people’s behavior we see around whenever we leave the house, reinforce this cynical world view. Well, not most of the time, but they’re there and we only realize it when the view and sound of it encounter our senses. For instance, the material and moral corruption that are almost always synonymous with politicians anywhere in the world cannot but inspire cynicism in most people. After going through years and decades of witnessing such news, people get accustomed to it and at first, there may be some denial or glossing over, but ultimately, we begin to accept it as fact and the way things really are – that humanity is just a Theory X game. 

What about the second predominant attitude of choice which is indifference? Merriam-Webster defines indifference as “the lack of interest, concern, enthusiasm, or feeling towards someone or something”. The engine further defines indifference as “representing a state of not caring or having no preference, often characterized by apathy, detachment, or neutrality, denoting a lack of importance – where something is neither good nor bad”. I personally think that indifference is also a defense mechanism for people who wish not to be burdened further by added stressors on top of what they already need to deal with in their jobs and personal lives. But an unavoidable reality which impacts individuals with this type of attitude anyway is the interconnectedness of everything in our earthly lives. For instance, political choices, even if avoided, have outcomes which impact everyone anyway regardless of attitudes. Hitting at the indifference of qualified leaders in his time, the wise Greek philosopher Plato once said that “the price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men”. Further expounding on this apathy which continues to apply to this day, “Plato argued that honorable, wise, and capable people often shy away from holding office because they don’t crave power, find it a burden, or want to avoid ruining their reputation”. But be that as it may, there are consequences suffered by all due to this indifference from deserving leaders. “By refusing to participate in politics or civic life, they create a power vacuum that is filled by those who are ‘inferior’ or ‘worse’ (sometimes interpreted as ‘fools’ or ‘evil men’).” Seen in such light, indifference is not neutral in effect, but a vote for the lesser choice. 

Finally, we come to the third attitude of choice – hope. Again, Merriam-Webster helps us out with its definition. Hope is “a desire for a specific, positive outcome combined with an expectation – or belief in the possibility – that it will occur. It is both an emotion and a cognitive, future-oriented mindset aimed at improvement.” For instance, if the latest popularity polls on Donald Trump are any indicator, some 55% to 64% of Americans hope his term ends soon so that he can be replaced by a leader who is much more competent. Logically, all Americans adversely impacted by the inflation caused by the Iran War are hopeful that a new leader will improve their lot. Illogically, however, Americans negatively impacted but still want Trump around, do not seem to fall within the Merriam-Webster definition because the outcome they’re getting is nowhere near positive. Not only Americans, I think, but much of the world are hopeful that a return to the moral order, characterized by peace and prosperity, would be a most welcome change. I do not think any sane human being would want continued conventional conflicts that could escalate into a nuclear global war which no one wins. Thus far, the world has been fortunate to be ruled by a global moral order having learned from the painful lessons of the Second World War in the last century. But this global order has been eroding fast in just over a year with much of it owed to America’s tolerance of Donald Trump. If the push-back from the rest of the world unjustly impacted by the Trump administration is any indicator, a big chunk of the world are hoping that much better leadership could rise in the White House making the world a better place once more.              

Nowadays, it seems everyone on Facebook wants to be counted among the 4Ps beneficiaries. And I don’t blame them. Because when “ordinary Filipinos in the working class” open their electric bills and discover they are helping shoulder discounts for others, their reaction can easily be envy, if not rage.

Let’s put it in proper context: Filipinos are good-natured; nobody is begrudging “the elderly and the below, the below poverty-line so to speak” for enjoying a little relief. In hard times, subsidies for the poorest are necessary.

That is not the issue, although some — out of exasperation — do bring the argument there where the poor are often favored and the dictum that “those who have less in life must have more in justice” becomes oppressive.

The issue for most in the working class is this: why are struggling working families being quietly tapped to pay for this “ayuda”?

A household that consumes over 200 kWh a month is hardly living in luxury. That could be a family of five in a cramped apartment, a multigenerational household sharing one meter, or a breadwinner who simply needs fans and lights running through the brutal summer heat. Is that now a punishable offense?

That is why Senators Bam Aquino and Risa Hontiveros are right to demand accountability, if not a lot of explaining, from the Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC). Aquino has filed Senate Resolution No. 375, seeking a Senate inquiry into the implementation of the Expanded Lifeline Rate Act, arguing that subsidies for marginalized consumers should be funded through government appropriations.

Perhaps, even a full review of Meralco’s collections and, subsequently, ordering refunds for excessive charges if warranted must be explored, as Hontiveros suggested. 

What has been quietly implemented has hit hard on most households, and the outrage has gone through opposite ends of the Senate political spectrum. I mean, from these two kakampinks, all the way to diehard-Sara supporter, Sen. Imee Marcos, lawmakers are noticing how this setup is unacceptable.

Taken all together, their message is simple: helping the poor should not come at the expense of the struggling middle that has been living literally from paycheck to paycheck.

To be fair, this is not entirely Meralco’s doing. The utility is implementing a subsidy system mandated under the Expanded Lifeline Rate Law and ERC regulations. The charge is small — roughly ₱2 for a household consuming 200 kWh — but that misses the point. 

If the government wants to provide ayuda-level discounts or zero billing for the poorest, then fund it through the national budget. Spread the responsibility through the thickening treasure chest of government padded by gross taxation. Am I right, Executive Secretary Ralph Recto?

Last month, President Marcos was enjoying a rebound in public approval, but nothing erodes goodwill faster than making hardworking Filipinos feel punished for working. That will drag BBM’s numbers back to Middle-earth.

*         *         *

SHORT BURSTS. For comments or reactions, email firingline@ymail.com or tweet @Side_View via X app (formerly Twitter). Read current and past issues of this column at https://www.thephilbiznews.com

The persistence of illegal gambling in our communities is not just a matter of vice — it is a reflection of how deeply organized networks can embed themselves into everyday life when oversight falters.

A recent emailed complaint I received from a resident of Marikina brings this reality into sharp focus, alleging the operation of a gambling syndicate within Provident Subdivision that runs illegal bookmaking for EZ2-Lotto, alongside hybrid and traditional forms of jueteng.

These are not small, isolated activities. According to information gathered, the operation is reportedly led by an individual known as “Pinong,” with a system that appears both structured and insulated. The involvement of a so-called bagman — identified as “Jojo,” a retired policeman of the Criminal Investigation and Detection Group — raises even more troubling questions. If true, this suggests not only organization but also a level of protection that allows such operations to continue with minimal disruption.

The scale is equally concerning. Collections allegedly reach millions of pesos across eastern Metro Manila, indicating a network that is both expansive and financially entrenched.

Even more revealing is the reported shift in Quezon City, where a competing operation was effectively absorbed after “Pinong” offered higher commissions to supervisors (known as cabo) of local collection agents. By increasing their share from 35 percent to 50 percent, he reportedly consolidated control over the area’s gambling proceeds. This is not just illegal activity — it is a market strategy applied to an underground enterprise.

What emerges is a picture of a syndicate that behaves less like a loose criminal group and more like a coordinated business, complete with incentives, territorial expansion, and operational hierarchy. That should concern anyone who believes that illegal gambling is a minor or victimless issue.

Mayor Maan Teodoro would be well within her mandate to examine these allegations closely. Whether they ultimately prove accurate or not, the seriousness of the claims alone warrants scrutiny. Local governments play a critical role in maintaining public order, and allegations of this magnitude — especially those hinting at possible links to law enforcement — cannot simply be ignored.

At its core, this issue is about more than gambling. It is about governance, accountability, and the rule of law. When illegal systems begin to mirror legitimate institutions in scale and efficiency, it signals a deeper problem — one that requires not just enforcement, but political will.

If communities are to remain secure and institutions credible, concerns like these must be addressed transparently and decisively. Silence, in cases like this, only strengthens the very networks that operate in the shadows.

*         *         *

SHORT BURSTS. For comments or reactions, email firingline@ymail.com or tweet @Side_View via X app (formerly Twitter). Read current and past issues of this column at https://www.thephilbiznews.com

Summer vacation is in. But what’s very much around the corner is a big change in School Year 2026–2027, as the Department of Education (DepEd) is pushing full steam ahead with its proposed three-term school calendar.

For those who thought that’s the end of it, fresh objections have hogged the headlines with teachers’ groups, lawmakers, and education stakeholders asking for more study, more flexibility, and more time to transition or rethink the entire policy.

DepEd says the shift is part of a bigger reform meant to address learning disruptions caused by typhoons, extreme heat, transport strikes, and other interruptions.

Still, this question lingers: Is this really reform, or just as we say, “pabalat-bunga,” if only to claim government is leaning in with an innovative solution?

Proponents argue that their premise is practical: Rearrange the school year into three comprehensively organized learning chapters and catch-up chapters, recover lost class days, and improve fluidity and efficiency in teaching.

But this neatly avoids the bigger and far uglier truth — that the crisis in Philippine education was never about the calendar.

The Philippines ranked 77th out of 81 countries in the 2022 Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). Fifteen-year-old Filipino students are estimated to be five to six years behind in the world’s most basic literacy yardstick subjects: Math, Reading, and Science. More than 80 percent failed to reach minimum proficiency.

Those figures alone should have forced the education bureaucracy — with the top-budgeted department in government — to confront the real roots of the crisis. Ironically, the clearest diagnosis of what is truly wrong is not coming out of bureaucratic offices, but from students.

During last week’s National Schools Press Conference, the editorial writing contestants were asked to write about this proposed three-term school calendar. I was told by journalism coaches — many of them seasoned practitioners themselves — that the students saw through the issue with remarkable clarity.

Their editorials did not focus on the superficial logic of moving academic dates around. They zeroed in on the actual barriers to learning: underpaid and undertrained teachers, shortages in books and learning materials, poor internet access, lack of computers and libraries, overcrowded classrooms, and school buildings that remain unfinished or unfit for learning.

These students wrote about classrooms with leaking roofs, broken windows, and unbearable heat. They wrote about students trying to learn in rooms with no ventilation and with electric fans that exist only because parents or donors provided them. They wrote about the indignity of holding classes in tents, under trees, while school buildings remain delayed for years.

In short, these children kept their eyes on the ball.

They understand that weather disturbances may suspend classes, but the deeper disruption is what awaits them when classes resume: schools unequipped to teach, systems unequipped to support, and policies that mistake administrative adjustments for meaningful reform.

Those editorial entries from the National Schools Press Conference ought to be published and placed on the desks of education officials and lawmakers.

Because these students already understand what too many authorities seem unwilling to admit…that no calendar redesign will solve an education crisis rooted in decades of neglect.

*         *         *

SHORT BURSTS. For comments or reactions, email firingline@ymail.com or tweet @Side_View via X app (formerly Twitter). Read current and past issues of this column at https://www.thephilbiznews.com

In one terminal, seasoned travelers began noticing a curious pattern: passengers requesting wheelchair assistance at check-in, only to walk briskly toward the boarding gate minutes later.

The wheelchair, it seems, had become less a necessity — and more a shortcut.

Priority lanes. Early boarding. Less waiting.

Convenience, repackaged.

A foreign investor based in the Philippines — and a friend of THEPHILBIZNEWS— has been quietly observing this practice for some time. It makes him cringe.

He is quick to clarify: Not all disabilities are visible, and he fully supports the rights and privileges of persons with disabilities. But what unsettles him is what happens next — once inside the aircraft, and especially upon arrival.

Some of these passengers, he noted, suddenly regain full mobility. Walking unaided, retrieving luggage with ease, and disembarking without any sign of the assistance they earlier required.

For him, the issue is fairness.

Because for every questionable request granted, there may be someone who genuinely needs assistance but ends up waiting longer, or worse, underserved.

Ground staff, caught in a delicate position, often have little choice. To question a request risks offending. To approve it unquestioningly risks abuse.

So the system bends.

And when systems bend often enough, they stop being systems — and start becoming loopholes.

Perhaps it’s time for authorities — such as the civil aviation regulator and service providers tasked with assisting passengers — to revisit how requests for wheelchair assistance are assessed. Not to deny, but to protect.

Some needs are visible. Others are not. That is understood.

But the spirit of the service was never meant to be exploited.

Because when assistance becomes strategy, the cost is borne not by those who misuse it — but by those who truly need it.

And that is where the real imbalance begins.

There is nothing novel about enforcing order in the streets. What is new?

Senator Robin Padilla is one of the names being floated in discussions for the vice presidency in 2028, largely on account of his winnability. Well, if helping lead this country is all about popularity, then we will never run out of celebrities running for office till kingdom come.

And what was his response to the talk?

He said that if former president Rodrigo Duterte instructs him to run for vice president, he would do so.

He did not say that if Duterte told him to jump off a bridge, he would obey — but judging by that line of thinking, one gets the sense that if he were told to bark like a dog, he probably would.

If this is the mentality of a possible future vice president — one whose political ambition depends entirely on the instruction of an ex-president many now call a berdugo — then what kind of leadership can the nation expect?

Unfortunately, Padilla’s logic mirrors that of many Duterte Diehard Supporters, or DDS: if Duterte says Padilla should run, then Padilla should run; if Duterte says vote for him, then they will vote for him.

What is less certain is whether this is truly what pro-Duterte Filipinos want for the country. Yet because of blind faith in a leader whose time is up — and whose political future appears increasingly bleak — they may still rally behind candidates out of loyalty rather than discernment.

The election is still far off, but perhaps now is the time for voters, especially the die-hards, to ask themselves whether their loyalty is to a political figure or to the nation itself.

Because the reality is this: Rodrigo Duterte is not returning to the presidency. His remaining power lies only in endorsing those around him, and perhaps not because they are the most capable, but because they are the most loyal.

And that is where the danger begins.

Public office is not a favor to be granted by political patronage, nor is national leadership something to be handed down as an act of obedience. To seek the vice presidency not out of conviction, competence, or vision, but simply because a former president said so, is to reduce the office into a reward for loyalty.

That is not leadership.

That is submission dressed up as public service — and a country that accepts that kind of reasoning risks electing not leaders, but extensions of another man’s will.

To see how disastrously this kind of politics can go, one need only look back at 2022.

I have heard even from DDS friends that Rodrigo Duterte himself did not believe Sara Duterte was ready for the presidency and had preferred Sen. Bong Go as his successor. To many of them, it made perfect sense. Bong Go had national recall through the Malasakit Centers; he enjoyed the public trust carried over from Duterte’s popularity, and after years as Duterte’s closest aide, he seemed the most natural extension of the former president’s leadership.

In other words, he was viewed as the safest political heir.

But Sara Duterte had other plans. Rather than spend six years as vice president under her father’s chosen successor, she chose to align herself with Ferdinand Marcos Jr., handing the Marcoses a path back to Malacañang in exchange for her own ascent.

And we all know where that alliance stands now.

That is precisely the danger in entertaining candidacies built merely on loyalty to a political patron. When the nation chooses leaders based on allegiance, familiarity, or borrowed popularity rather than competence and vision, public office becomes part of a power arrangement rather than an instrument of national progress.

*         *         *

Like a game of chess, Zaldy Co — the alleged “King” of the flood control scam — has finally been cornered. Arrested in the Czech Republic, his endgame has come. Czechmate!

*         *         *

SHORT BURSTS. For comments or reactions, email firingline@ymail.com or tweet @Side_View via X app (formerly Twitter). Read current and past issues of this column at https://www.thephilbiznews.com

Behind the scenes, it’s poker night.

As public outrage brews over flood control controversies and the drumbeat for impeachment grows louder, insiders say the real action isn’t in hearings or headlines — it’s in quiet conversations, closed doors, and carefully played hands between the Upper Chamber and the Palace.

Chips are on the table, and everyone’s bluffing.

According to a source of THEPHILBIZNEWS who let slip more than intended, one official recently took a “graceful exit” to another department — a polite way of stepping away from a table that had become too uncomfortable to sit at.

Why?

Because the game, apparently, is no longer subtle.

Players in the Upper Chamber are said to be flashing numbers — not always on record, but enough to make the Palace pay attention. Enough to suggest that those entangled in the flood control mess may not just survive — they may come out stronger, with a clearer path to the next election cycle.

And then came the whisper that changed the stakes.

Proceed with impeachment, the Palace was allegedly told, and watch the flood control investigations quietly stall. Push the wrong move, and the cards will be reshuffled — not in your favor.

A bluff?

Or a winning hand already dealt?

Inside the Palace, nerves are beginning to show. Because if the so-called “top contender” returns to power in 2028, today’s decision-makers may find themselves answering very different questions.

Some insiders want to play it straight — let the investigations run, follow the evidence, call the hand.

Others appear to be folding early.

If, in the coming weeks, the flood control probe suddenly loses momentum, don’t expect an announcement. Don’t expect an explanation.

In this kind of game, silence is the signal.

Because when the chips are high and the players are familiar, outcomes are rarely accidental.

After all, in politics — as in poker — there’s always an understanding among those at the table.

Not written. Not spoken. But always played.